Township website

Log Out | Topics | Search Moderators | Edit Profile

Author Message   uh yeah Unregistered User Posted on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - 10:57 am:        Needs some work... don't ya think??? http://www.robbinsville-twp.org/   www Unregistered User Posted on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - 10:29 pm:        Looks way better tahn it did before this version. The last one looked like one of the Pond Road students made it.   dfgh Unregistered User Posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - 06:32 am:        What, no games on the website?   uh yeah Unregistered User Posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - 01:49 pm:        @www it still looks bad. Let's compare it to Hamilton's website,... www.hamiltonnj.com/ dfgh: Games would actually help our website!!! LOL   Need a new website Unregistered User Posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - 03:25 pm:        I didn't think ours was bad until I saw the Hamilton website. Wow! Their website is incredibly user friendly and you can find the information you are looking for really easy! Their webmaster did a terrific job. We should hire them.   uh yeah Unregistered User Posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - 03:28 pm:        that's all I'm trying to say... it's not that hard to make it better... case closed. Admin: Please remove this thread. LOL   www Unregistered User Posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - 10:28 pm:        @Need a new website speak for yourself. My taces are high enough!   2 cents Unregistered User Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 08:05 am:        Again, I'm sure there is an agenda here. The two sites look very similar to me, except for the images they are almost identical designs. I agree, the old site was very bad.   No complaints Unregistered User Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 01:56 pm:        I've found that the site works fine. Whenever I've gone on, I haven't had a problem finding what I am looking for. No need to waste money enhancing it. there are better places to spend the town's budget.   uh yeah Unregistered User Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 01:58 pm:        agreed no need to waste money there. End of story. still needs some work though... when compared to other sites... just sayin...   Need a new website Unregistered User Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 07:37 pm:        You are contradicting yourself, uh yeah. If you want them to do some work on the website, that obviously will cost some money. So which is it? Get some work done on the website or "no need to waste money there"?   uh yeah Unregistered User Posted on Friday, January 13, 2012 - 09:29 am:        NANW: I guess I'm saying "no need to waste money there"... and just making a point. Or maybe my point is for the money already spent on the website it could be better. I delete the needs some work comment so I don't sound like I am contrdicting myself. Do you actually have an opinion of the website or just on my comments???   Need a new website Unregistered User Posted on Sunday, January 15, 2012 - 10:00 am:        See above for my opinion, "uh yeah".   Uh yeah Unregistered User Posted on Monday, January 16, 2012 - 09:01 am:        Oh there it is... thanks...   Hamilton Unregistered User Posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 - 06:46 am:        Why does Hamiltons website need to be bought up? Isnt this discussion about Robbinsville? I sense a little jealousy here!!!   dfgh Unregistered User Posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 - 08:55 am:        Much ado about nothing...   Uh yeah Unregistered User Posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 - 09:10 am:        dfgh... agreed... moving on sorry.   In the know Unregistered User Posted on Thursday, January 19, 2012 - 04:51 am:        Ok I am going to give you some insider scoop. The guy who did Hamilton site also did Robbinsvilles. They had an inter local for design. However one serves 92,000 people the other 15,000 so they are different. Obviously the budget is different also. I just thought after reading the thread I would share that insight. Both towns save money using the same group.   Uh yeah Unregistered User Posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 - 09:24 am:        Thanks ITK.